IOSG Founding Partner: The Pump.fun public sale seems more like the team seeking liquidity exit, with the project and market fundamentals unable to support the inflated valuation.
BlockBeats News, July 10th, IOSG Founding Partner Jocy posted on social media, stating that he believes this Pump.fun public sale is more like using participants as exit liquidity, constituting a highly speculative gamble.
Jocy stated that since its launch in early 2024, Pump.fun has experienced explosive growth, with a cumulative protocol revenue of about $7 billion, becoming one of the most profitable projects in the cryptocurrency field. However, Pump.fun's daily revenue has dropped by 92% from its peak, currently standing at only about $500,000. The project's market cap has plummeted from tens of millions of dollars in the past to a rock-bottom $50,000 to $100,000. Its market share has also been surpassed by a competitor, LetsBonk (with a 51% share), causing Pump.fun to fall to 39.9%.
From a tokenomics and risk exposure perspective, this ICO round targeted retail investors (15%) and institutions (18%), selling a total of 33% of the tokens, corresponding to a funding amount of $1.32 billion. Considering past fee revenues, the http://Pump.fun team will hold nearly $2 billion in cash. This poses an extremely unfriendly risk exposure to public investors:
· Lack of transparent governance structure: Decision-making process is a mystery
· Team/Investor release terms are opaque
· Overvalued financing has overdrawn future growth potential
Jocy stated that he believes the Pump.fun team has neither the intention nor the ability to "pump" or "control" the price. They have already amassed a huge fortune through fees, and this ICO is more like a final "value realization" (Exit Liquidity). In the current market environment with severely insufficient buying pressure, such a high valuation simply cannot be sustained. This is completely different from Hyperliquid's valuation support logic. Jocy believes that this market public fundraising is a highly speculative gamble, not a fundamental investment. The funds invested should be risk capital that can be completely lost. The market's enthusiasm for meme launch platforms and shitcoins has shown signs of fatigue. Investors are advised to wait for the token to trade on the open market for a week before making a decision, observing the true market response.
You may also like

Tether's major shareholder invests £12 million to support the "British version of Trump" in the cryptocurrency sector

Huang Renxun's Latest Podcast: Will NVIDIA Reach $1 Trillion? Will the Number of Programmers Increase Instead of Decrease? How to Deal with AI Anxiety?

Besides Resolv Hack, This DeFi Vulnerability Type Has Occurred Four Times

Trump Cries Peace, $1.5 Billion Dash | Rewire News Evening Brief

From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

