Weekly Crypto Regulation Roundup: Trump Backs Fed Nominee, SEC Clarifies Tokenization Rules

By: crypto insight|2026/02/02 00:00:00
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways:

  • Shift in U.S. Crypto Regulation: Recent developments indicate a move towards clearer regulations, though the process remains complex and politicized.
  • Federal Reserve Nomination: President Trump’s choice for Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, may signify a more Bitcoin-friendly stance.
  • CLARITY Act Progress: The CLARITY Act, aimed at defining crypto oversight, inches forward with a narrow Senate vote.
  • SEC’s Stance on Tokenization: The SEC has decisively stated that tokenizing securities doesn’t alter their legal status under federal law.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-01 14:14:27

In a flurry of regulatory updates, this past week showcased the evolving landscape of crypto policy in the United States, revealing ongoing struggles and significant strides toward clearer frameworks. As 2026 unfolds, the dynamics of digital currency regulations continue to shape with both nuanced adjustments and stark clarifications. The twin forces of innovation and regulation are in an intricate dance, setting the stage for a pivotal year in crypto governance.

Trump’s Federal Reserve Nomination and Crypto’s Future

A significant disruption has surfaced with President Donald Trump’s announcement to nominate Kevin Warsh as the upcoming chair of the Federal Reserve. Warsh, a name familiar within financial and governmental circles, is recognized for his openness to experimenting with nontraditional financial structures and has referred to Bitcoin as a significant asset. This nomination is particularly newsworthy as it suggests potential shifts in how the U.S. might approach economic frameworks involving cryptocurrencies.

If Warsh’s nomination passes, it could introduce a larger acceptance of crypto assets like Bitcoin within macroeconomic policies. While the Fed chair does not hold direct regulatory power over cryptocurrency, the influence on market perceptions and innovation policies could be profound. Bitcoin proponents eagerly anticipate a more favorable national discourse on digital assets as Warsh steps into this critical role.

Challenges and Progress of the CLARITY Act

Another focal point in this evolving narrative is the CLARITY Act, designed to pivot U.S. crypto regulation from its entrenched enforcement-focused approach to a more straightforward and statutory framework. The act aims to delineate clear jurisdictions between the CFTC, which would oversee digital commodity spot markets, and the SEC, tasked with regulation over investment contracts involving digital tokens.

The path for the CLARITY Act has been anything but smooth, marked by a tight 12-11 vote in the Senate Agriculture Committee. Interestingly, all amendments passed along party lines without Democratic backing, highlighting the political divides that persist even in the sphere of financial innovation. The shelving of a contentious swipe-fee amendment by Senator Roger Marshall showcases how peripheral financial disputes can derail progress on crypto-specific legislation, underscoring the complexity of achieving regulatory clarity in this domain.

Ripple’s Fortuitous Support at the SEC

Ripple, a significant player in the crypto space, has found unexpected support from Teresa Goody Guillén, formerly of the SEC. Her public comments reinforce Ripple’s stance that speculation should not automatically invoke securities regulations. This support underlines a broader movement within policy circles to decouple the asset’s inherent characteristics from the investment contracts representing them. This paradigm shift could fundamentally reshape how digital tokens are classified in future regulatory frameworks.

This stance aligns with Ripple’s advocacy for a policy that distinguishes digital assets from the contracts tied to them, potentially easing the classification hurdles that cryptocurrencies often encounter. As this differentiation gains traction, it may open the door for a more nuanced understanding of digital asset regulation, paving the way for a more streamlined and equitable regulatory process.

SEC’s Firm Position on Tokenized Securities

The SEC has delivered one of its most unambiguous statements to date regarding tokenization, clarifying that integrating blockchain technology into securities—such as stocks and bonds—does not alter their legal classification. The Commission’s message is clear: while the format might be innovative, the underlying legal obligations of being a security under federal law remain unchanged.

By maintaining this stance, the SEC underscores its commitment to applying existing securities laws to all forms of financial products, on and off the blockchain. This decision is pivotal as tokenization gains traction, transitioning from experimental projects to mainstream financial instruments. The SEC’s firm line ensures that as these technologies evolve, they do so within a recognized legal framework, maintaining investor protections and market stability.

White House’s Role in the Stablecoin Debate

The debate surrounding stablecoins, a critical aspect of the CLARITY Act, remains in limbo despite extensive negotiations. To address unresolved aspects, the White House is slated to host a key meeting involving crypto executives, finance leaders, and interest groups. The discussions will center on the intricacies of stablecoin interest and reward schemes, which have been sticking points in achieving consensus.

If an agreement remains elusive beyond the set negotiation period, the planned meeting might see delays. This intervention by the White House underscores the centrality of stablecoins in the broader regulatory dialogue, highlighting their role in the digital finance landscape and the necessity for a balanced regulatory approach.

Concerns Over DOJ’s Crypto Crime Unit Shutdown

In recent developments, the decision to disband the DOJ’s crypto crime unit has drawn scrutiny from six U.S. senators. Concerns over potential conflicts of interest have been raised following reports that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was involved in the decision, holds significant cryptocurrency assets. This incident invites critical examination of enforcement priorities and the alignment of personal and professional interests within government ranks.

The decision to shut down the unit raises broader questions about the federal government’s commitment to addressing illicit finance activities in the growing digital markets. With cryptocurrencies continuing to be entwined with stories of fraud and noncompliance, ensuring robust oversight and enforcement remains paramount.

The Future Landscape for Prediction Markets

On the innovation front, prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi are drawing increased attention. The CFTC, led by Chairman Mike Selig, is pushing for more comprehensive rulebooks to accommodate these platforms, which have seen a surge in activity. The agency’s approach to devising standards for event contracts reflects its support for legitimate innovation, tempered by the need for robust regulatory guidelines.

By fostering a clearer framework for prediction markets, the CFTC acknowledges their increasing prominence and aims to provide clarity that fosters growth while safeguarding market integrity. These steps are indicative of a broader shift towards balancing regulation with innovation, crucial for maintaining trust and stability in emerging digital financial ecosystems.

Conclusion: Navigating a Transitioning Regulatory Era

The past week’s developments indicate that the U.S. is on the brink of transitioning towards a regulatory environment characterized by less enforcement and more clarity. However, these changes emerge amidst intricate political negotiations, power dynamics, and pressure from both traditional financial sectors and crypto-native businesses.

As the regulatory framework continues to evolve, stakeholders across the spectrum—from policy makers to market participants—must navigate these changes with an eye on maintaining both innovation and consumer protection. While clarity seems imminent, it arrives with the caveat that the path forward is uneven and unpredictable. Nonetheless, each advancement shapes the regulatory landscape of tomorrow, incrementally forging a more coherent and structured system for all parties involved.

FAQs

How will Kevin Warsh’s potential position as Federal Reserve chair affect Bitcoin?

Kevin Warsh’s nomination suggests a potentially more favorable stance toward Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as he is known to be more open to alternative monetary systems, including digital currencies. This could influence broader economic policies and market sentiment around crypto assets.

What is the purpose of the CLARITY Act in cryptocurrency regulation?

The CLARITY Act aims to establish transparent regulatory guidelines for cryptocurrencies, moving away from the previous enforcement-heavy approach. It seeks to clearly define the roles of the CFTC and the SEC in overseeing different aspects of the crypto market, thereby providing more certainty for market participants.

Why is the SEC’s stance on tokenized securities significant?

The SEC’s clarification that tokenized securities remain subject to traditional securities laws is crucial as it ensures continuity in legal obligations, even when financial products are wrapped in blockchain technology. This position helps maintain investor protection and market stability amid technological changes.

What are stablecoins, and why are they significant in the CLARITY Act discussions?

Stablecoins are digital currencies designed to maintain a stable value relative to a currency or commodity. They are significant in regulatory discussions because of their growing use in transactions and potential implications for monetary policy and financial stability, necessitating clear regulatory frameworks.

What is the impact of the DOJ’s decision to shut down the crypto crime unit?

The dismantling of the DOJ’s crypto crime unit raises concerns about the federal government’s commitment to combating illicit activities in digital markets, especially given the complexities and unique challenges presented by cryptocurrencies in illicit finance.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more